I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is 50 bullets. But I really need to locate a bullet from the 160 course that my older rifle likes.

I've applied H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i use it. There aren't many cartridges which i utilize it for as I look normally to gravitate to other powders. Having said that, I can not express that it isn't going to perform. It is just that Another powders function better for just a supplied cartridge. As an illustration, inside the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic velocity and very fine teams with Nosler 140 AB. However, RL19 was marginally much better in precision, even though the velocity was practically equivalent.

Can they be interchanged without worries other then employing normal load procedures when switching from lot to large amount?

Caution using SC or SSC developed loads with extended Reduce, back off and do the job up. Use Safe and sound loading tactics.

Thornton, CO Provide of H4831SC is starting to dwindle down far too so get what you'll need on your new load I might suggest. Could possibly be all of almost nothing when they restock anything Soon but those powders are possessing transport regulation troubles.

Considering the fact that there does not look like any "Formal" Load Data out there for this Load, can some of you supply a starting point with this mixture and factors to consider when Performing this h4831 vs h4831sc Load up?

If there isn't any load data it's because this powder is not really suited to this cartridge. Commonly just one will not likely discover just one powder to suit all cartridges, and also the relatives of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) you are inquiring about isn't going to work.

The SC or SSC selected powders Usually permit for higher load density, so you can generally get a tad a lot more powder inside a offered case when utilizing compressed loads. Use of a fall tube can even more improve this advantage.

Currently using IMR 4831 inside a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked option for this caliber and yields somewhat more velocity. Besides it currently being shorter Slash, exactly what is the primary difference in these two powders, and should I swap to H4831sc?

locutus mentioned: I even now have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows by means of my powder measures effortlessly.

Confirm YOUR AGE Specific states prohibit promoting or promoting of firearms, ammunition, and linked firearm factors to minors. We’d like to make sure that you’re 18 many years of age or more mature ahead of allowing for you to shop our internet site. Have you been 18 decades of age or more mature?

It's been a bit, but I h4831sc did get some 4831 SC to test. Uncovered a node and shot some teams. I shot a .six 5 shot group right now. It's a little slower than H1000, but shoots great. Many thanks for the advice, It can be excellent to understand that I've bought alternatives when a person or another powder is dried up.

I frequently often have the sc Edition. Employing a powder measure it hangs up fewer as a result of shorter kernels and I think permits extra steady metering so fewer time you take trickling in the final bit of demand to produce weight. So in essence the SC h4831sc saves you situations

The reality that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is precisely why you are observing higher velocities received with that powder, instead of That which you've observed with the IMR things.